Posts Tagged ‘creative commons’

TED Talk Supporting the Embrace of the Remix

Tuesday, September 18th, 2012

In the spirit of Solomon, Kirby Ferguson makes a compelling argument to Embrace the Remix in his TED talk about copyright and patent law.

How willing are you to share your creative work with others?  If you’re interested, check out Creave Common Licenses for your content so that it’s explicitly shared.

Museopen Releases More Public Domain Classical Music

Friday, August 17th, 2012

Funded by it’s Kickstarter campaign, Museopen as released several professional recordings of classical music into the public domain.  If you’re looking for classical music for a backing soundtrack or just enjoy listening to classical music, check out the site!  There even more music done by other submitters as well.

Blender Foundation’s Sintel released online today

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

I’m hoping to do a more in depth review soon, but I couldn’t wait to post that the Blender Foundation’s third open movie project Sintel has been released online.  It is just a testament to what is possible with free and open source software.   It’s a huge accomplishment for the Blender Foundation and a huge inspiration to me personally to keep learning and expanding my toolset.

The movie is also a way cool business model based on making everything available for sharing, education and remixing via Creative Commons license.  Share it with your organization, your friends, your followers.  Copy it, download it, use it as your church service countdown video this week, do what you want with it just as long as you attribute it.

Congratulations for a job well done.  I am in awe!  I look forward to seeing more faith-based organizations taking advantage of the amazing free and open source multimedia tools that are available like Blender, Gimp, Inkscape, MyPaint, Alchemy and others.

Matt Mason’s Piracy Dilemma

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

I read The Pirate’s Dilemma by Matt Mason sometime last year and really enjoyed it.  He just posted a presentation he did recently at Incubate 2010 that summarizes a lot of the book on his blog and I wanted to pass it around for discussion.  I think he does a great job at balancing the fact that we do need intellectual property laws, but that laws aren’t going to stop piracy.  Things like open source and Creative Commons licenses are just market reactions to bad IP laws in some sense.  People are looking for better and easier ways to share, collaborate, remix and join in a conversation with you and your organization.  Take advantage of that as we move into a new era of communication by using and contributing to open source and Creative Commons projects.

The World’s Tiniest Open Source Violin

Friday, May 21st, 2010

I just couldn’t help but make this a full blog post instead of a tweet:

Obviously, I’m behind the times.  Too bad I don’t have a cool beard like this guy…

Why You Don’t Have Time To Not Use Open Source

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

Lately, in a couple of the conversations I’ve had about open source, people keep bringing up the fact that they “don’t have time” to use open source.  Whether they use the excuse of a busy family life or really have no substantive excuse, it’s a generally recurring theme when a move to open source is brought up.  And on the surface it seems like a very real and valid excuse.  Who isn’t busy these days?  Most families could fill every waking hour with stuff going on at their church, work, school, or home.  I get it.  I work for a software startup company which can have erratic hours.  I’m married to a wife whom I love spending quality time with.  We have two kids under 2 which speaks for itself.  And although we’ve backed our church involvement off a bit since having our second kiddo, we try to be involved as much as we can with church.  My wife and I also volunteer at a local non-profit Northern Churches Care.  Life is busy for us…and that’s why I’m glad I use open source software.

I’m not sure whether it’s misinformation or just past experience with open source projects before they were mature, but there is a general preconception that open source software takes extra time out of your already busy schedule.  While this is definitely the case for some (especially newer, less mature) projects, I find it to generally not be the case for most mature, well-developed open source projects.  If anything, a mature open source alternative is break even when it comes to time spent in the software itself.  Obviously, there is a learning curve for new software, but that isn’t caused by the open source-ness, but rather the new-ness.

On the other hand, I know I save time by using open source software and Creative Commons materials at least some of the time.  While certain things might take longer with an open source alternative versus a proprietary package, other things take a shorter amount of time.  A lot of times this is specific to each software alternative, but there are some general themes that are always the case across all packages.  While I’m sure there are others, here are the ones that stand out to me:

  1. Less time is needed to obtain open source software.  As long as you have an internet connection at work, home, or a public access point, most of the time you can have software installed in a minute or two.  I don’t have to have a credit card to pay.  I don’t have to have a login to download it.  And I especially don’t have to go to a store or wait for it to be shipped.  I also don’t have to waste time finding my license key and validating it.  Worst case scenario: I have to google the download page before going to the site.  Even better, if you’re using any Linux distribution with a decent package manager, you just go to the installer or package management application and find the software, then click “Install” and POOF!  The package manager downloads, installs and configures the application appropriate to my system.  Sweet.
  2. Less time obtaining the license to use content.  Because I use all Creative Commons content, it’s easy to make sure I comply with the license without contacting the license owner.  The terms of the licenses are already explicit and I only have to add a quick way to attribute the works.  For images, Flickr and Google Image Search both have advanced search options to find Creative Commons graphics.  There are several Creative Commons music sites as well.
  3. If you represent an organization, you must always be aware of all uses of the software in your organization because of liability.  This means you have to not only purchase the licenses, but keep track and make sure you are not violating the terms of the licenses through unauthorized copies (which are easy to have in an organization of any size).  Not keeping track of your licenses not only generally means you are breaking the law, but also means you are liable for fines when you aren’t complying.  For any open source software line items, just put a big “?” in that column and don’t worry about it because it doesn’t matter how many people use it, copy it or distribute it.  Whew!  What a relief!
  4. Related to #3 above, if you are auditing things, you not only have to account for all your software but also track down and eliminate unauthorized copies.  We all know that there’s always some quick project where some volunteer or member wants to do something on another computer (usually a personal computer instead of an organizations hardware) so that they can take it home, make a deadline or whatever.  Invariably, they ask if they can install some software (which they wouldn’t have a license for) of the organization’s “temporarily” to complete the project.  Of course, they and you are breaking the law if you don’t purchase another copy of the software for that person/computer.  So you should be telling them that you can’t do that.  Not fun to be on the giving or receiving end of that situation whether you toe the line or not.  Of course, if you’re using open source software the answer is easy.  Install it on as many computers as you need to get the job done…no matter whether you have control over those computers or not.
  5. Time spent worrying about any of the above.  Any of the above situations causes tension in our lives.  Whether deciding if it’s worth $1300-2600 ($500-1000 for non-profits) per seat for CS5 or replaying the conversation you had with a volunteer where you told them that you couldn’t install software on their computer, tension sucks time and energy from our lives even when the source of the tension is over.  Using software with open source licenses is extremely freeing.  Because I use all open source software, I just don’t worry about a lot of things any more (mostly related to my budget).  Instead I get to use my time learning how to use great open source software in many creative ways.

Of course, all of this assumes you have good open source alternatives for the commercial counterparts.  So here is a list of most used desktop software and a stable, mature open source alternative.

  1. Windows/OSX -> Ubuntu Linux
  2. Office -> OpenOffice
  3. VMWare -> VirtualBox
  4. Photoshop -> Gimp
  5. Illustrator -> Inkscape
  6. InDesign -> Scribus
  7. Internet Explorer -> Firefox (even though IE is free, there are still many advantages to using an open source alternative)

Along these lines, I’d like to share a personal story of how this helps in real life.  I was visiting my parents, and we had flown because both the kiddos were still free (I’ll leave the horrible flight story for another time).  Because of all the kid stuff, I didn’t have room for my laptop.  That wasn’t a big deal, though, because I was trying to get away and relax a bit.  While at my parents, they wanted some help with some touch-up and titling on a photo they wanted to send friends and relatives.  Of course, they don’t know much about graphics, so I was on the hook.  Now, I didn’t have my computer or my normal setup because I had left it at home.  In proprietary land, I would have been up a creek.  Instead, I just quickly downloaded and installed Gimp onto my parents’ computer.  Because Gimp is cross-platform and available on Windows and not just Linux (another common theme of mature open source software), I didn’t even miss a beat.  I was able to complete the project easily, and my mom was ecstatic.

So, there are my opinions and experience about how open source saves me time.  Do others have experiences to share about how open source has saved you time?

Installing Gimp Paint Studio on Windows

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

So, it’s been a very busy week.  I haven’t had the time I want to start working on several tutorials that are on my list.  I did run across this tutorial from David Revoy though.

David is the concept artist for this year’s Blender Open Movie, Sintel.  If you have a creative community at your church and they haven’t checked out Blender or Gimp, they should.  Both are highly capable media and graphics packages with a huge feature set.  Both also have the main complaint being that the user interface is hard to use.  Both are doing huge user interface redesigns this year to help remedy that.

Gimp Paint Studio is really just a add-on set of tools for Gimp to help make it more like Corel Painter.  David does some amazing work with Gimp and Alchemy.  He also used to be a Photoshop user which is proof that you can make the switch!  He also created the content for a Blender training DVD that shows you the professional workflow he used to create his art with all open source software.  You can support the Blender Foundation by purchasing it, but like all Blender Foundation training DVDs it is released under a Creative Commons licensing so downloading a copy is completely legal.  You don’t have an excuse not to check it out.

Anyway, if you are a creative type and are tired of paying through the nose for your software, I can tell you there is a ton of professional level open source software and Gimp Paint Studio is one of them.  Hope the tutorial is helpful.

Rethinking Copyright Law

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Wasn’t planning on doing this post, but I read this article from the Economist this morning.  It’s a good succinct article about the copyright debate.  Here’s a more in depth discussion in case you are interested.  Whether you feel breaking copyright law is an ethical issue or not, I think we should all be able to agree that the current state of things isn’t working very well.

While more “Mickey Mouse Protection Acts” might be passed and technically legal, more companies are going to be forced into more liberal licensing through open source and Creative Commons licenses through market forces and competition.  This trend is the market correcting for bad copyright law; the market is in a state of diminishing returns when it keeps extending copyright protection.

Of course, some Christians I know just pirate digital media no matter what the laws say without thinking anything about it.  I’ve even seen lots of “bending of the rules” for church purposes.  I’d be interested in your comments about the ethics and morality of breaking copyright law.  For me, I try to comply with copyright law no matter how ridiculous it is.  That, of course, leads me to use open source and Creative Commons works because I can’t afford to do everything I want to do and comply with proprietary software and copyrighted media law. Luckily for me, there’s lots of great open source software and Creative Commons works out there so it’s a win-win scenario.

So if you feel like piracy is wrong and haven’t checked out open source and/or Creative Commons projects, I encourage you to start now.